Question 6
To further test the hospital triage system, administrators selected
200 nights and randomly assigned a new triage system to be used on 100
nights and a standard system on the remaining 100 nights. They
calculated the nightly median waiting time (MWT) to see a physician. The
average MWT for the new system was 4 hours with a standard deviation of
0.5 hours while the average MWT for the old system was 6 hours with a
standard deviation of 2 hours. Consider the hypothesis of a decrease in
the mean MWT associated with the new treatment.
What does the 95% independent group confidence interval with unequal
variances suggest vis a vis this hypothesis? (Because there's so many
observations per group, just use the Z quantile instead of the T.)
Options:
Options:
- When subtracting (old - new) the interval is entirely above zero. The new system appears to be effective. (correct)
- When subtracting (old - new) the interval is entirely above zero. The new system does not appear to be effective.
- When subtracting (old - new) the interval contains 0. The new system appears to be effective. (previously chosen)
- When subtracting (old - new) the interval contains 0. There is not evidence suggesting that the new system is effective. (previously chosen)
- X <- 6; Sx <- 2
Y <- 4; Sy <- 0.5
nx <- 100; ny <- 100
df <- (Sx^2/nx + Sy^2/ny)^2/((Sx^2/nx)^2/(nx-1) + (Sy^2/ny)^2/(ny-1))
X - Y + c(-1,1) * qt(0.975, df) * sqrt(Sx^2/nx + Sy^2/ny) - return: [1] 1.591503 2.408497
- Z quantile: (4 - 6)/(2/sqrt(100))
Side note: remember that the calculation of confidence intervals is different for the situation of equal and unequal variance. For unequal variance, the degree of freedom (df) has to be calculated in a more complicated way.
沒有留言:
張貼留言