Motor vehicles include more than just motorcycles. As a data scientist, one should always try to answer the question correctly.
peer 1 → I see no issues. Full marks given.
peer 2 →
Nice use of colouring and graphics in general. However, the student has
assumed that "motor vehicles" are the same as "motor cycles", and this
is not the case, so I subtracted 1 point because of this.
peer 3 →
Overall, work is good, with the exception that the two plots on
motor-vehicle sources use only motorcycle data. Though discussion on the
forums made it clear that there could be several interpretations of
motor vehicles, I think it is quite clear that more than just
motorcycles should be included, especially since the motorcycle-only
emissions represent a tiny fraction of the total motor vehicle emissions
(if defined as on-road emissions). The code does appear to produce the
plots, so I gave credit for that, but deducted points on the plots since
they don't tell enough of the story to meaningfully address the motor
vehicle question in my opinion.
peer 4 → [This area was left blank by the evaluator.]
沒有留言:
張貼留言